Utilization of electronic resources
5.3 Electronic resource utilization
(2003). They reported high usage of Internet re
sources. Some of the reasons
services in the University. Librarians interviewed revealed that some students
integral part of learning therefore, such students have not been exposed to
enabling the positive, and successful use of the electronic res
USING A SMART PHONE TO GET INFORMATION
ources while at
Some students arrive at Mbarara University with computer utilization skills, while
that library staff has not done much to sensitize students on the value and
journals and web resources. Findings revealed that some of the respondents
others come with no computer skills. One librarian interviewed had this to say:
“you have students that rush in on the first day saying where the facilities for e
attributed to this high usage of the Internet are the freely available access, the ease
school. Therefore, information professionals at MUST need to pay more
indicated that they use e- resources in the library while some did not use them.
by e-mail. This concurs with a study carried out by De Vicente., (2004) Falk,
This is an indication that some students do not use e-resources and this calls for
environment with poor learning facilities that do not include the library as an
USING A TABLET TO GET INFORMATION
were not effectively utilizing the eresources because they lack computer skills.
information technologies and information sources. This partly provides an
strategies among others so as to promote the use of electronic information
another enquiry to find out what other alternatives students use in meeting their
al. (2007) argue that the students’ ability to find and retrieve information
effectively is a transferable skill useful for their future life in addition to
It is increasingly an important function of academic libraries today to provide
students saying I don’t know anything about email, eresources”. This reveals
resources are, I would like to send an e-mail, and on the other side you have
information in electronic formats including indexes, full-text articles, complete
explanation why some students do not use the e-resources in the library. Tella et
importance of e-resources. Internet search engines were the most used followed
academic work.
attention to make every user aware of various available e-resources and search
The study agrees with Nlyidizi (2005) that most students come from rural
of use and the currency of resources.
2.5 Strategies adopted for e-resource utilization
that will enable them to exploit the massive eresources that are in existence
and those from less developed countries as a way of developing information
literacy skills which will enable students to acquire information retrieval skills
out collaborative joint projects between professionals from developed countries
today. According to Katundu (2000), information literacy in the curriculum has
One solution that was recommended by Pejova (2006) is launching and carrying
not received much attention due to the factor that only librarians are engag
USING A LAPTOP TO GET INFORMATION
he teaching of the library discipline. Many authors such as Heseltine (2000) and
libraries in developing countries. In the opinion of Dai et al (2000), there is a
purpose of identifying and addressing common needs arising from development in
made to relate information sources to various courses, thus rendering it functional
technology applications. This strategy would improve on e-resource utilization, as
participants that will be charged with executing and monitoring programs
inter-library lending.
and activities.
information technology, especially the growing importance of the internet and the
The study used utilized a crosssectional survey design with quantitative and
easy description and interpretation of people’s opinions, the interview guide was
and more meaningful to students.
•Identifying the necessary infrastructure for electronic access to resources.
useful in this regard. A quantitative research design was used in determining
Rader (2000) agree that a successful information literacy programme can be well
•Selecting a coordinating agency to work on behalf of the entire group of
library staff. A qualitative research design was used to bring the researcher and
World Wide Web. According to Bedi and Sharma (2008) the strategies in this
Libraries in Africa. Libraries the world over are forming alliances for the
This will enable financially weak University libraries to contribute to a general
percentages and frequencies. It was also useful in drawing tables and pie charts
aggregators to provide access in which purchase is done by consortia.
library staff would be expected to provide leadership in computer applications
delivered when it is integrated within curriculum. This is the only way that can be
the respondents together and help the researcher to have indepth understanding
Omoniwa (2003) observes that power will rest largely on staff that possesses
problems of managing, organizing and archiving the electronic resources (Bedi
&Sharma, 2008). Therefore consortia are imperative towards the improvement of
into a greater ability of students to exploit the massive technologies in academic
resources of various institutions available to it is in a better position to resolve the
of the variables under study. According to Bailey (1987) such a design allows an
qualitative approaches to assess electronic information resources utilization by
pool that would ensure the utilization of jointly acquired ICT facilities as a means
multiple skills. Employment of librarians for instance, should be based on skills in
3. Methodology
need for a library consortium that will ensure collective acquisition of e-resources.
Such an arrangement has made it possible for users to access and download
•Identifying and negotiating with the potential publishers/vendors or
of gaining easy access for the users. A consortium with the collective strength of
the required materials without even going through the elaborate process of
such as Internet and CD-ROM technologies among others. This would translate
direction include among others:
students in MUST. Using this design, data was collected from both students and
that brought out the study results.
Stratified random sampling strategy was applied and the population was divided
4.1 Demographic characteristics
Female 97 36.3
n=266
Table 1: Shows Gender of respondents/students
constraints because interviews would be difficult to arrange for students.
Male 169 63.7
Age Frequency percentage
and usefulness. The responses were checked for legibility. EXCEL was used to
into four strata and a sample from each Faculty was randomly selected. Busha
.
advantage of enabling respondents to give their opinions independently
perform descriptive statistics. Tables and pie charts were used in the data analysis
tabulated. Through editing, the raw data was checked for accuracy, completeness
Data analysis was mainly done by use of qualitative and quantitative methods.
the research interest.
of the researcher (Moser &Kalton, 1997). Secondly, questionnaire also had an
4. Findings
The demographic characteristics are summarized in tables, 1, 2,3, and 4
Frequency Percent
Table: 2: Shows the Ages of respondents/students
representative sample with less variation. Data was collected mainly with a
(Sarantakos 2003).
questionnaires was the most appropriate method for students because of time
USING A TAB TO GET INFORMATION
structured questionnaire because questionnaires provide an opportunity for
The study targeted three hundred forty eight (348) respondents/students to fill in
and Harper (1980) assert that stratified sampling strategy ensures a more
The raw data was organized in such a way that it was edited, classified and
Gender n=266
respondents to give frank and anonymous answers is not affected by the presence
processes to show the trends of events and to compare two or more variables of
the self-administered questionnaires. However, out of the 348- targeted students,
the researcher managed to get back 266 (76%) responded. Nonetheless use of
19-20
Namasiya, this is a good blog
ReplyDeleteMark: 5/5